Italy’s Constitutional Court

Italy’s Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court of the Italian Republic, or Consulta, is Italy’s highest court regarding matters of constitutional law. In keeping with the framers’ notion of a “rigid” constitution and a centralized system, the court was designed as an ad hoc organ for constitutional justice separate from the judiciary. The court resolves controversies on the constitutional legitimacy of laws issued by the State or Regions, settles conflicts involving the allocation of powers between the State and Regions, and passes judgement on charges brought against the president.

Consulta vs. SCOTUS

To better understand the ideas underpinning Italy’s approach to constitutional review, a quick comparison with the US Supreme Court is in order. The US Supreme Court, or SCOTUS, functions in a decentralized system and is expressly intended to act as a check on the legislative and executive branches. This is not the function of Italy’s Constitutional Court, which instead sets out to rigidly apply the constitution in its judgments. This is reflected in the selection of cases to be heard. The US Supreme Court has a famously elaborate selection process, choosing cases based on what the individual justices find most pressing or urgent. In Italy, meanwhile, questions of constitutionality that end up in the Constitutional Court are usually simply submitted by ordinary judges. Consequently, the caseload of Consulta is significantly higher than that of SCOTUS.

Even the composition of the two courts highlights the different approaches. As befits a system of checks and balances, the US President fills any vacancy in the Supreme Court and the Senate confirms the choice. Invariably, there is a political component to this. Italy, with it’s more centralized philosophy, seeks to reduce the politics involved by dividing the court into thirds: five judges appointed by the President, five elected by the Parliament, and five elected by the ordinary and administrative supreme courts.

Which is not to say there are no similarities between the courts. As both deal with questions of constitutionality, their judgments have considerable impact on their respective legal systems. In this way, the common law system of the US Supreme Court more closely resembles Italy’s Constitutional Court than its Supreme Court of Cassation. 
This should be particularly kept in mind when reading about the jurisprudential evolution of the 1948-rule for dual citizenship claims heard before the Court of Rome. 
By |2019-09-12T21:48:04+00:00April 27th, 2018|Blog, Judicial|0 Comments

About the Author:

I have a passion for helping people and from an early age wanted to become an attorney. My experience in international business has helped to prepare me for working with people of all kinds and on many different levels. I love being a problem solver and look forward to each new challenge. I respect the law and strive to help my clients achieve the justice that our legal system affords each person. I take great pride in helping people do what is right and just. I founded My Lawyer in Italy and put together a group of high quality specialists and associates to serve the legal needs of our community here and abroad. I want to do the very best for my clients and see that as my first priority.

Leave A Comment

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) EU law 2016/679 on data protection and privacy: we use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.